To insure or not to insure
#11
Posted 30 April 2012 - 06:15 PM
#12
Posted 30 April 2012 - 11:06 PM
S
#13
Posted 01 May 2012 - 02:19 AM
#14
Posted 01 May 2012 - 02:33 AM
I sure wish I hadn't listened....
#15
Posted 01 May 2012 - 06:19 AM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sammy - Rough, tough cream puff
Gone but never forgotten
RVA Dream Deelite and TLF Adamas
#16
Posted 01 May 2012 - 06:38 AM
Here is a question for those that do know about insurance- using my yearling gelding who my fiance pointed out was not worth the $10,000 that the surgery would cost (although quickly decided it was in his best interest not to protest). Would insurance still cover the cost of a procedure or treatment if it was going to be more than the value of the horse or would they prefer to have them euthanized.
- Slide likes this
JUSTADANCE+ Regional Champion and Canadian National Top 10, CA LAILAH- SHN Top 10
WR SHADDO HAWK- Multi Regional Champion and SHN Top 10 (3rd) SHIH
MAGNIFICO ZF- Regional Champion halter and SHN Reserve Champion SHIH yearling
#17
Posted 01 May 2012 - 06:52 AM
I think that is a decision everyone has to make for themselves. I usually do not insure mine although if I have one that is very valualbe or will be showing a lot then I do insure. But, especially when I was up to 10 it really was not cost effective so I was basically self insured. I over the past 15 years I did have 2 that needed to go to clinics- one had colic surgery at Cornell the other was worked up and euthanized. While it was no fun paying the bills in the long run I don't know that I wouls have been further ahead to have them insured. Both were homebred, the one that had surgery was only a yearling so would not have been insured for much at that point.
Here is a question for those that do know about insurance- using my yearling gelding who my fiance pointed out was not worth the $10,000 that the surgery would cost (although quickly decided it was in his best interest not to protest). Would insurance still cover the cost of a procedure or treatment if it was going to be more than the value of the horse or would they prefer to have them euthanized.
I think Slide answered this already - see post #10. Most insurers do not provide major medical coverage at the same amount as the mortality insurance (only less). 75% of mortality was the figure she gave, but I assume that depends on many variables, including value of horse, use, age, history, etc.
CA and SCID negative.
#18
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:33 AM
(edit for clarification): The policy I had with Jarvis was overseas and surplus lines (I'll try and find it to get the exact carrier) I'd rather have an admitted carrier like Great American and American Equine insurance group. Most of the insurance that is marketed to Arabian owners is surplus lines. Surplus lines carriers aren't regulated the same way and are akin to a bank not being FDIC insured. Surplus lines = non-admitted.
A good agent/broker will have access to several reputable A-rated, admitted carriers that can't quote between companies and advise you on the best company/policy for your needs.
I know there's Jarvis, Agririsk and Markel agents around reading this. They all may have something that you like and are comfortable with and that's great. It's about filling your needs and mitigating your risk.
Edited by Slide, 01 May 2012 - 09:06 AM.
#19
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:36 AM
2012 U.S. National Top Ten PB Hunter Pleasure AAOTR 36-54; Region 2 Champ Hunter Pl. AATR 40+ and Hunter Pl. Open, Res Champ PB Hunter Pl. AAOTR; Region 1 Champion PB Hunter Pleasure AAOTR 40 and over, Reserve Champion PB Hunter Pleasure AATR 40 and over
2011 U.S. National Top Ten (third!) PB Hunter Pleasure AAOTR 36-54, Region 1 Champ PB Hunter AAOTR 40 and Over, Region 2 Reserve Champ PB Hunter AATR
#20
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:37 AM
CA and SCID negative.















